Blog Comments
Blog Comments
User Rating
You are not logged in. Please login to review this user.
Feedback Digest
This Feedback Digest is based on 16 feedbacks in 6 mediations, initially submitted on 1st April 2023 and realised by Ana Maria Maia Gonçalves.
Leandro RennĂ³, as mediator, has been described by the parties who have utilised his services as exhibiting a range of commendable qualities and skills. These include resilience, proactivity, and an ethical stance. He has demonstrated extensive knowledge, negotiation proficiency, flexibility, patience, and impartiality. Leandro effectively balances the interests of the parties, striving to find solutions that accommodate their needs. He approaches his work with a calm and knowledgeable demeanor, emphasising active listening. Although an agreement was not reached in some cases, Leandro's ability to listen, inspire trust, and manage tense moments between the parties was noted. He stimulated the exploration of creative solutions and approached legal issues impartially.
Despite the absence of a formal agreement in some mediations of the feedbacks reviews, Leandro's skills were instrumental in facilitating a smooth process and maintaining dialogue even during challenging moments. His ability to listen attentively and propose effective alternatives encouraged progress in discussions, particularly in complex situations involving multiple parties. Leandro's technical expertise and attentive handling of difficulties contributed significantly to reaching agreements. Parties appreciate his role in promoting conversations and providing technical knowledge that facilitates the formalisation of agreements.
Leandro's performance was highly regarded for overcoming misunderstandings, demonstrating a constructive approach, and seeking mediated solutions even when an agreement was not achieved. His conciliatory and calming nature played a crucial role in creating a peaceful environment for the parties involved. Notably, Leandro excelled in the pre-mediation phase, organising reports for parties to provide a comprehensive overview of the issues. During the procedure, he ensured parties felt heard, encouraged private sessions, and refocused them on their interests, even in cases where mediation did not culminate in an agreement. Mr. Leandro RennĂ³ has consistently been rated at a high-performance level and no negative comments to his performance have been received.
Leandro RennĂ³, as mediator, has been described by the parties who have utilised his services as exhibiting a range of commendable qualities and skills. These include resilience, proactivity, and an ethical stance. He has demonstrated extensive knowledge, negotiation proficiency, flexibility, patience, and impartiality. Leandro effectively balances the interests of the parties, striving to find solutions that accommodate their needs. He approaches his work with a calm and knowledgeable demeanor, emphasising active listening. Although an agreement was not reached in some cases, Leandro's ability to listen, inspire trust, and manage tense moments between the parties was noted. He stimulated the exploration of creative solutions and approached legal issues impartially.
Despite the absence of a formal agreement in some mediations of the feedbacks reviews, Leandro's skills were instrumental in facilitating a smooth process and maintaining dialogue even during challenging moments. His ability to listen attentively and propose effective alternatives encouraged progress in discussions, particularly in complex situations involving multiple parties. Leandro's technical expertise and attentive handling of difficulties contributed significantly to reaching agreements. Parties appreciate his role in promoting conversations and providing technical knowledge that facilitates the formalisation of agreements.
Leandro's performance was highly regarded for overcoming misunderstandings, demonstrating a constructive approach, and seeking mediated solutions even when an agreement was not achieved. His conciliatory and calming nature played a crucial role in creating a peaceful environment for the parties involved. Notably, Leandro excelled in the pre-mediation phase, organising reports for parties to provide a comprehensive overview of the issues. During the procedure, he ensured parties felt heard, encouraged private sessions, and refocused them on their interests, even in cases where mediation did not culminate in an agreement. Mr. Leandro RennĂ³ has consistently been rated at a high-performance level and no negative comments to his performance have been received.
Feedback digest
This Feedback Digest is based on 11 feedback in 8 mediations, initially submitted on Friday 31st March 2017. Feedback from these cases affirmed Mr. Leandro RennĂ³ as being a mediator able to show impartiality during the process. Most parties agree that he is overall a very competent professional, and referred to his listening ability and his focus on rapidly establishing a collaborative environment as the skills that stand out from his work. Mr. Leandro RennĂ³ was again noted for his sensitive approach and ethical character, and parties found that this contributed to the success of the mediation. Most lawyers and parties think Mr. Leandro RennĂ³ is someone that knows how to communicate can stimulate creativity of all present at mediation. Pragmatic, and direct in the conduction of the mediation process, parties also mentioned that he did not put pressure on any party to accept any settlement at any point during the mediation. Respect of others, sense of dialogue and showing internal tranquility during all the mediation process, and mainly when deadlocks happened, have been words used by parties and lawyers to describe Mr. Leandro RennĂ³'s way of mediating. The feedback that has been received from the parties for which Mr. Leandro RennĂ³ has acted as a mediator are consistently positive. They have all reported that they would recommend him to others. Mr. Leandro RennĂ³ has consistently been rated at a high-performance level and no negative comments to his performance have been received.
This feedback digest was last updated 4 April 2017.
This feedback digest was last updated 4 April 2017.